Density functional theory: Wisdom of the crowd – GGA functionals

In the previous post, I used a bunch of LDA functionals to study the hydrogen bond in the water dimer. The idea is quite simple but unique and “novel”: combine different exchange and correlation functionals and take an average result.

In this post, I update the result with nearly 4000 GGA functionals.

gga
Binding energy De (in kcal/mol) of the water dimer calculated with nearly 4000 functionals

Let’s discuss

  • A lot of functionals predict quite good binding energy, within 1-2 kcal/mol. Many even give me an error of less than 0.2 kcal/mol.
  • Some functionals give horribly bad results, either too strong binding, or no binding at all.
  • The average number:  5.13±4.66 kcal/mol, it’s a perfect match with the experimental value 5.02 kcal/mol. This is the highest accuracy I have ever since I start doing computational chemistry. MN15, can you do this?
  • Using this approach, we don’t need extra correction for dispersion correction such as DFT-D3
  • What should I call this “functional”? My colleagues propose me “people functional”, I then call it PEEFUN.
1494874518-romper
People celebrating extraordinarily high accuracy of the people functional (PEEFUN)

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s